The example of used cars captures the essence of the problem.
From time to time one hears either mention of or surprise at the
large price difference between new cars and those which have just
left the showroom. The usual lunch table justification for this
phenomenon is the pure joy of owning a "new" car. We offer a
different explanation. Suppose (for the sake of clarity rather than
reality) that there are just four kinds of cars. There are new cars
and used cars. There are good cars and bad cars (which in America
are known as "lemons"). A new car may be a good car or a lemon,
and of course the same is true of used cars.
The individuals in this market buy a new automobile without
knowing whether the car they buy will be good or a lemon. But they
do know that with probability q it is a good car and with probability
(1-9) it is a lemon; by assumption, q is the proportion of good
cars produced and (1-q) is the proportion of lemons.
After owning a specific car, however, for a length of time, the
car owner can form a good idea of the quality of this machine; i.e.,
the owner assigns a new probability to the event that his car is a
lemon. This estimate is more accurate than the original estimate.
An asymmetry in available information has developed: for the
sellers now have more knowledge about the quality of a car than
the buyers. But good can and bad cars must still sell at the same
price- since it is impossible for a buyer to tell the difference between
a good car and a bad car. It is apparent that a used car cannot
have the same valuation as a new car -if it did have the same
valuation, it would clearly be advantageous to trade a lemon at
the price of new car, and buy another new car, at a higher probability
q of being good and a lower probability of being bad. Thus
the owner of a good machine must be locked in. Not only is it
true that he cannot receive the true value of his car, but he cannot
even obtain the expected value of a new car.
Asymmetrical Information
It has been seen that the good cars may be driven out of the
market by the lemons. But in a more continuous case with different
grades of goods, even worse pathologies can exist. For it is quite
possible to have the bad driving out the not-so-bad driving out the
medium driving out the not-so-good driving out the good in such
a sequence of events that no market exists at all.
One can assume that the demand for used automobiles depends
most strongly upon two variables -the price of the automobile p
and the average quality of used cars traded, p, or Qd= D (p, p). Both
the supply of used cars and also the average quality p will depend
upon the price, or p= p (p) and S= S(p). And in equilibrium the
supply must equal the demand for the given average quality, or
S(p) =D(p, p(p)). As the price falls, normally the quality will
also fall. And it is quite possible that no goods will be traded at
any price level.
Such an example can be derived from utility theory.
My blog gives all data, facts and statistics about global real politic economic system, factors of production, poverty and inequality. Also I give information about popular hedonic life of human-beings. I believe that economy science must become a holistic social science that includes all multi dimensions of human (body, mind, soul) and to give inspiration (motivation) to become perfect "homo-economicus" generations for the 21th century.
Kaydol:
Kayıt Yorumları (Atom)
Why the heck is there still an automotive chip shortage?
A side from the raw, human toll, COVID-19 has dramatically changed how we live, from travel and education to the way people work. This ...
-
A lakefront property in Lake Tahoe, Nevada, owned for more than two decades by the notorious businessman, pilot and director Howard Hughes,...
-
by Dan Stone We’ve all heard about China’s incredible pace of development. Now, finally, we have a symbol of that runaway growth: por...
-
The quantity of money circulating in an economy affects both micro and macroeconomic trends. At the micro level, a large supply of free and...
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder